|
October 1999 |
|
Demo
99 Attendees Experience Vehicle Smarts and Ohio Heat --
Demo ’99 Highlights |
|
|||||
|
|
||||||
The scene at the Tent: Demo ’99 (TRC, East Liberty, Ohio, USA) |
||||||
|
Widely
considered a success, many people said that the demo exceeded their expectations
and felt that they had greatly expanded their awareness of the IV arena by
attending. Comments from
demonstrators -- those bringing vehicles -- also indicated that they found the
event valuable, through the positive visibility gained and new business
connections made. Dick Landis,
chair of the ITSA CVO committee, said, “This is an example of ITS America
at its best, in bringing together diverse industry players around a common
theme, in order to cultivate deployment and future markets.”
|
|
|||||
|
Ten
cars and five trucks were equipped with driver assistance technology (see
sidebar), providing a diverse experience for the attendees.
The demonstrations varied from
close-to-market devices for heavy trucks, to emerging applications for transit
buses (precise docking) to
U.S.
government officials also found the event useful.
Toni Wilbur, newly appointed Technical Director within the FHWA
Office of Safety and Traffic Operations R&D, said, “I really enjoyed it
— the Demo was perfect as I was starting my new job.
The hands-on aspects really made all the difference — you could either
ride or drive in everything. It’s
so much more memorable that way.” “I
was impressed with the magnitude of it, since it was all industry driven,”
said Ray Resendes, program manager for the USDOT Intelligent Vehicle
Initiative. “We are beyond early
units, to having advanced technology on-board.” Cross-industry
networking was supported by a diverse set of
attendees. Among others, Eaton,
Honda, Landstar, Ford, Daimler-Chrysler, Nissan, TransCore, and the U.S.
Postal Service had representatives present. ITS America, which began planning for the event last January,
also considered the event a success, according to Steve Keppler, Director
of the ITSA Vehicle Systems Department. ITSA
completed certification rides prior to the event, focusing on safety and Demo
quality. European
attendees, in discussions prior to the Demo, expressed significant interest, yet
bemoaned the fact that it conflicted with their vacation season; few Europeans
actually attended. In contrast,
there were many Japanese participants. |
OSU’s Experimental Vision cars await their next run at Demo ‘99 |
|||||
|
Media coverage, which was important to demonstrators and to ITS America, was considered adequate but somewhat low — local newspapers and television stations attended, as well as trade press. CNN showed interest in the Demo but did not attend.
|
3M’s lane tracking Expedition |
|||||
|
One
disappointment in the Demo was the lack of transit buses
(Ann Arbor Transit Authority cancelled a few weeks prior to the
Demo), and the lack of any representatives from transit agencies in attendance.
Only PATH’s demonstration of a bus precision docking system
represented transit applications in any real way. |
||||||
|
Stars of the Show
Based
upon discussions with many of the attendees, several aspects of the Demo emerged
as especially interesting. The Volvo
heavy truck was probably the most popular, for the design of the cab
overall, the level of integration of vehicle systems, and particularly the
operation of the Eaton VORAD EVT-300 Adaptive Cruise Control.
Because the Volvo truck was in radio contact with its target vehicle,
it was clear to attendees that the throttle of the car was controlling
the speed of the truck. The truck
also executed a quick stopping maneuver at the same time as a car in the
adjacent lane — both vehicles stopped in approximately the same distance,
allowing Volvo to show their advanced stopping capability.
Overall, the presence of three heavy trucks solidly placed commercial
vehicles in the forefront of IV deployment. The SafeTrak
Lane Departure / Drowsy Driver Warning System (produced by Assistware
-- see related article on page 27) was very visible, as it was installed on
both the Volvo and the Mack truck. The
unit on the Mack was the latest generation prototype, capable of tracking the
lane and also providing a “steering precision index” which gave the driver a
“score” of his performance in tracking the lane. The Freightliner truck had a similar device in
operation. Several attendees were
surprised as to how close to market these devices are. The
360-degree monitoring capability of the Altra collision warning system
was of high interest, particularly to truckers. |
||||||
|
Freightliner Performs
Dramatic Braking Demo
The
Freightliner truck equipped with an Electronic Braking System performed a
special demonstration on Monday for the press.
In this demo, a very slick surface was created on a The
Eaton VORAD forward collision warning system was present on all three trucks;
the FCW capability was only minor to their demonstrations, as they view this as
established technology fully in the marketplace.
The EVT-300 ACC system is proving to be very popular among researchers,
as it offers an azimuth output for radar returns. Making Motorcycle
History
Demo
’99 was significant in that it offered the first public demonstration of
Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) radar systems tracking on a motorcycle.
The American Motorcycle Association (AMA) was present with a Honda
motorcycle; their rider participated in both the Altra and the Delphi demonstrations,
with the radar systems tracking reliably on this small radar target.
For several years, the AMA has publicly stated its concern that vehicular
radars may not be able to detect motorcycles in cluttered target environments;
thus, this demo was very important to their membership in easing their concerns.
During a break between demos, AMA described to the Delphi representative
a fatal motorcycle crash type of which Delphi was unaware: a car making a left
turn in front of fast-approaching motorcycle.
The Delphi radar provides the necessary coverage in these situations, but
this data is suppressed to prevent false alarms in other situations.
Various methods were then postulated during the conversation in which the
Delphi system could shift to different algorithms to detect motorcycles in these
circumstances. New Approaches to Driver
Interfaces
New
and more sophisticated display technologies were evident in Demo ’99, such as
the Muth signal mirrors (Altra, MnDOT) and haptic feedback systems
(NHTSA, MnDOT, and Volvo). In the
NHTSA vehicle, attendees noted the high sensitivity of the human body, which can
feel even very slight decelerations as an attention cue.
Development of highly integrated and graceful human interfaces is likely
to be a new growth area in the IV arena, since the basic sensor systems now have
been demonstrated to work well. What’s Left to Look
Forward To?
Looking
at the broader array of IV applications, missing from the Demo were advanced
driver assistance approaches for heavy trucks (such as truck convoying), guided
buses, and low speed automation. Demonstration
of low speed automation (i.e., stop-’n’-go) could be a key attraction in a
future Demo, particularly with attendees driving, as this actually may be the
first implementation of full automation that becomes available to the general
public. [Top] |
Mack tractor (right) prepares to enter Demo track as Freightliner finishes a run |
|||||
|
... visit the ITS America web site at www.itsa.org. [Top] |
||||||
|
Copyright 1999-2001: IVsource.net and Richard Bishop Consulting (RBC). All Rights Reserved. |
|
October 1999 |