|
December 2000 |
International
Task Force Addresses Automation Deployment
and Government Roles
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The
fourth annual meeting of the International Task Force on Vehicle-Highway
Automation convened at Congress Center Epochal in Tsukuba City, Japan on
December 1, 2000. The meeting was
hosted by the Public Works Research Institute (PWRI) of the Japanese
Ministry of Construction (MOC) and the Japanese Advanced Cruise-Assist
Highway System Research Association (AHSRA).
Richard Bishop, consultant in the intelligent vehicles field,
chaired the proceedings. The meeting was attended by 42 invited participants, with representation from Australia, the European Commission, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Most of the attendees were with various government agencies, though several represented research laboratories and private sector organizations. Two European vehicle manufacturers were directly represented (Fiat and Volkswagen), with Japanese manufacturers represented through AHSRA. The meeting was structured in two parts. First, on November 30, Session 6 of the Demo 2000 technical seminars provided Task Force members an opportunity to deliver an overview of relevant program activities worldwide. Second, the ITFVHA group met again on December 1 to examine several key issues:
Each of these three topics
was addressed by both public and private sector representatives from Asia,
Europe, and the USA. The
presentations (which can be found
for review or download in the IVsource Reading
Room) were followed by discussion. Toshiyuki Nakamura, General Manager of the Public Works Research Institute (PWRI), gave an opening speech to welcome participants. He noted that Advanced Cruise Systems are now "on the edge of practical utilization," as clearly reflected by the vehicle systems that could be seen operating during Demo 2000. ITFVHA's Mission Recapped Mr. Bishop reviewed the history of ITFVHA, which began with a meeting in San Diego in 1997, then in Delft, Netherlands (1998), then in Toronto (1999). He offered that the purpose of ITFVHA is to examine the potential of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) to deliver societal benefits -- primarily congestion relief and safety. Vehicle-vehicle and vehicle-highway cooperation plays a central role. The ITFVHA sees itself as a forum in which to discuss government-industry roles in the development and deployment of ADAS; other objectives of the group include raising awareness, providing a means to exchange views, creating linkages globally, building momentum, and mutually reinforcing similar programs worldwide. Mr. Bishop put forth that
the purpose of this 4th ITFVHA was to examine the evolution of ADAS.
He suggested that, if the marketplace could be relied upon to deliver optimum
systems for individual vehicles, and if highway agencies could be trusted to
optimize the road network, then ITFVHA could focus its task on looking at
societal benefits achievable through coordinated efforts between government and
industry, and between vehicles and highways. The flow of the day's
agenda was designed accordingly to put forth deployment and human issues which
might lead to key questions of the role of government and infrastructure in
implementing promising system approaches. Program
Focus Varies Worldwide Based on presentations from programs worldwide, variations in focus among ADAS programs emerged, as shown in the table below. Advanced
Driver Assistance Systems: Program
Focus
Advanced
Driver Assistance Systems: Deployment
Attributes
Examining
Deployment The group's discussion on
deployment issues produced several insights:
Transit Deployment Sequence Rolling Forward It was noted that a key
deployment sequence is already unfolding for automated transit systems.
Automation is now in operation for rail transit, including driverless
operations. Various automated and
semi-automated bus transit systems are now being implemented, and Toyota's
IMTS system (which incorporates automated platooning of buses) is
expected to be in service in summer of 2001 .
The group felt that a growing awareness of these systems on the part of
the public will help overall deployment. Doing
the Right Things? With respect to user
issues and public perception, it was concluded that, for the most part, players
worldwide are doing the right things and that the various annual demonstrations
in particular have been very useful. A key challenge exists in ensuring
that the public (and individual drivers) understand the actual capability of the
systems in their vehicles ("sir, your collision avoidance system will not
drive the car for you ..."), even
while maintaining a "vision-pull" -- that is, keeping collective
sights set on the promise of much more capable vehicles. Regarding human factors for ADAS, there is extensive work underway worldwide, in the public sector, private sector, and in government-industry partnerships. Based on the information presented at the Task Force meeting, the general conclusion was that the great majority of the key issues in human factors are being covered adequately by ongoing research. Activities to examine
roles for the infrastructure (both autonomous infrastructure and infrastructure
support of in-vehicle systems) are clearly leading towards deployment
-- this is happening at a rapid pace in Japan, and more gradually
elsewhere. In this program aspect
there is perhaps the greatest diversity worldwide -- in Japan, SmartWay
systems support crash avoidance; in Europe, intelligent speed adaptation
is of key interest; and in the US, intersection collision avoidance is the top
priority. There is overlap among
these approaches, and increased information exchange on a global level is
expected. Guidelines
for Latecomers One delegate from the
Pacific Rim asked what guidelines can be offered to the late-comers -- countries
that only now are starting to consider examinations of advanced safety and
driver assistance systems? Comments
pointed to the Japanese program as a good roadmap:
the infrastructure agencies identify problems and address them with
autonomous infrastructure systems (such as blind curves), and vehicle-makers
identify problems and address them with autonomous vehicle systems. In the
Japanese model, cooperation occurs only when the infrastructure community
decides to put intelligence in the highway and the compatible systems evolve in
the vehicles. Others noted that
since traffic and societal issues vary so much from country to country,
individual countries should conduct studies to determine their particular needs. Looking
for a Home In years past, the ITFVHA
has had no institutional sponsor -- meetings have come together each year
through grassroots efforts and the persistence of a particular champion. The chairman noted that the Phoenix project, sponsored
by Caltrans, has shown interest in taking over long-term sponsorship of
the ITFVHA. The group was glad to
accept the offer -- Phoenix is therefore expected to become the organizational
home of ITFVHA sometime before the next meeting. The ITFVHA 2001 meeting
will be held in conjunction with the 2001 ITS World Congress in Sydney,
Australia, which will be held September 30 - October 4. The
specific dates for the meeting, relative to the World Congress, will be
determined later. [Top]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For more information ... ... contact Richard Bishop at richardbishop@mindspring.com. Look for the full meeting proceedings to be posted soon at IVsource. [Top]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright 2000: IVsource.net and Richard Bishop Consulting (RBC). All Rights Reserved. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 2000 |