Go to the IVsource Home Page

IVsource.net Home

October 2002

Intelligent Vehicles: An International Look at Trends and Issues
IVsource.net
13 October 2002

... or, “Intelligent Vehicles in a Nutshell,” a broad overview and quick read for readers inside and outside the IV world.


Fast coming to our roads and everyday lives are intelligent vehicle systems.  Intelligent vehicles are capable of automatically assessing road situations and assisting drivers in operation of their vehicles, offering significant benefits in the way of convenience, safety, and productivity.  These vehicles possess sensing, perception, driver-vehicle interface, and possibly actuation capability – that is, the driver is advised of a critical situation and/or automatic systems control the brakes, throttle, or steering as necessary to avoid a crash.

This short overview article will take a look at where we are now, in both the commercial sector and government programs, as well as current trends, emerging research topics, and major issues.

Where We Are Now:  Commercial Sector for Intelligent Vehicles

On the Market:
  • Forward Collision Warning (US trucks)

  • Blind Spot Monitors  (US & European trucks)

  • Adaptive Cruise Control (US, Europe, Japan)

  • Lane Departure Warning (US & European trucks)

  • Night Vision (US, Europe)

  • Assisted Steering (Japan)

Close to Market
  • Pre-Crash Safety Systems

  • Forward Collision Warning for cars

  • Lane Departure Warning for cars

  • Curve Speed Warning  

Under Intensive Development  
  • Stop and Go ACC

  • Processed Image Night Vision

  • Lane / Road Departure Active Countermeasures

Where We Are Now:  Commercial Sector for Intelligent Vehicles

As can be seen above, quite a variety of intelligent vehicle systems have entered the market in various parts of the world.  The Japanese market is considered best for early product introductions, followed generally by Europe.  The US market is last on the list for most IV products due to the liability climate there – manufacturers want to make sure the systems are robust and reliable before increasing their risk exposure.

Where We Are Now:  Government Programs

Governments are investing in the development, evaluation, and deployment of IV systems on a global basis. 

In the US, it’s the USDOT's Intelligent Vehicle Initiative, which is focusing on active safety systems for cars, trucks, buses, and specialty vehicles (including snowplows).  Evaluation of safety impacts is key, generally through extensive ffield operational testing.  Examples of systems being evaluated are forward collision warning for passenger cars, lane departure warning, road departure warning, stability control, electronically controlled braking, side object detection, drowsy driver countermeasures, and automatic collision notification.  They are also supporting pre-competitive research w/ vehicle OEMs.

The Japanese Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport has completed Phase II of work through their AHSRA research consortium.  Crash countermeasure systems have been prototyped for fog, curves, forward obstacles, pedestrian detection, and intersections.  Their approach includes both autonomous vehicle systems and cooperative vehicle-highway systems, and extensive deployment planning is now complete.

By contrast, the European Union's 5th Framework program, and now the 6th Framework,  represents a 'big picture' approach which includes attention to societal analyses, sustainability, users, legal, and institutional issues.  EU funding has supported technology development in areas such as  radar networks, sensor fusion, wireless communication, and much more.

National programs in Europe include the French LIVIC laboratory, the Dutch Advanced Vehicle Guidance program, the German INVENT program, and the Swedish Intelligent Speed Adaptation program, all of which focus on developing advanced features.  In the UK, DTLR has just published a major new research plan, which includes a strong component to develop cooperative vehicle-highway systems.

Some Trends

Adaptive Cruise Control is the flagship IV system on the market right now.  ACC maintains a set speed like normal cruise control, but uses radar or lidar to monitor the distance to any slower preceding vehicles and to maintain a driver-selectable gap in those cases.  The experience, on the motorway at least, is virtually foot-free driving.  ACC was introduced in Japan in the mid-nineties and in Europe in the late nineties.  It is now available from Mercedes Benz, BMW, Jaguar, Renault, and Nissan.  In the US, the system is available from Mercedes Benz, Nissan, and Toyota.  Recently, Volkswagen announced they will offer the system next year, and Jaguar has announced an introduction in the US soon.  Reports from the dealerships indicate good uptake on these systems, which add in the range of $800 – $2200 to the price of the vehicle.  ACC is seen as a key test case for future IV products – will drivers trust the systems?  Will they find them useful, even indispensable?  Will the inevitable imperfections be accepted?

In addition, given the litigious climate in the US, manufacturers will be gauging their future strategy with respect to IV systems by their experience with ACC in that market.

Forward Collision Warning (FCW) systems for passenger cars are not far away.  A precursor is pre-crash safety systems, which use radar to sense an impending crash, stiffening passenger restraints and firing the airbag just before impact.  Experience with this system will be important in evaluating radar performance for FCW.  Toyota has announced they are introducing a pre-crash safety system in 2003.  The US government is also investing heavily in development and evaluation of FCW in a joint project with General Motors.  Later this year, a fleet of Buicks will hit the road, equipped with a near-production quality FCW system.  The cars will be driver by volunteer drivers in normal everyday usage, with data recorders gathering information on usage and effectiveness.

Situational Awareness will be a key enabler for many types of IV systems.  Systems which monitor activity 360 degrees around the car are in development, and this information will support more intelligent crash avoidance maneuvers (e.g., less severe braking for a forward obstacle if another vehicle is very close behind).

Driver Workload Managers are also being developed as one of many ways to address driver distraction.  These systems combine 360 degree monitoring, which assesses traffic complexity in addition to close proximity vehicles, with in-cab driver activity monitoring to manage the flow of information and interruptions to the driver.  For example, if the driver is in the midst of making a lane change, the Driver Workload Manager would hold a cell phone call and suppress the ringing phone for several seconds until the driver is safely in the new lane.

Emerging Research Topics

A wealth of research topics are emerging from the proliferation of intelligent vehicle systems.  For instance, what is the effect of ACC on traffic flow?  Will traffic be more turbulent or smoother?  Can the control algorithms operating within the ACC vehicles be optimized for varying traffic conditions?  

While substantial research has been done in the past for emergency conditions, understanding driver behavior for normal, uneventful driving has arisen as a key need in order to provide a baseline for driver distraction and other driver performance measures.  Similarly, crash pre-cursors are a key knowledge gap – what happens in those countless near-miss situations that could tell us something about crash avoidance?  Data collection systems are now being deployed by researchers and highway agencies to monitor vehicle interactions at places such as high-crash intersections.  Data collected will be analyzed to understand the complex vehicle interactions.

More broadly, a consensus is forming that, in order to move to a higher level of performance than what is achievable with independent intelligent vehicle systems and intelligent highway systems, cooperative vehicle-highway systems are essential.  Such systems play an important role in safety (for those cases where vehicle-based sensors can’t “see” due to obstructions) and cooperation is essential for traffic flow improvements – both between vehicles and between vehicles and the infrastructure.

Delivering to the Public on ITS  

What is the traveling public’s biggest fear?  A crash in which they or their loved ones are involved.  This sentiment drives sales of IV safety systems.  Yet, crashes are so rare for any one person, that this possibility generally stays in the background.  

Looking at road travel from a different dimension, what is the public’s biggest daily headache?  Most would agree that it is the appalling traffic conditions on many roads.  Cooperative vehicle-highway systems offer a ray of hope.  In order to bring two very different worlds together and achieve some gains, traffic managers must begin to think of vehicles as controllable system components, and vehicle manufacturer s must look beyond the vehicle to offer their customers systems which can potentially improve their trip time.

As an example, a “Responsive ACC” mode has been conceptualized in which vehicle ACC systems would respond automatically to dynamic speed limits on equipped motorways.  Such a system would take the driver out of the loop (for speed control only), and allow much finer-grained vehicle speed management – decreased traffic turbulence and possible increased per-lane capacity is envisioned.

An Intelligent Vehicle Future

Intelligent vehicles are coming into the marketplace and therefore into our everyday lives.  A steady rollout of such systems for cars and trucks can be expected throughout this decade and beyond.  These systems hold the promise of much safer travel, and, in working with smart highway systems, the possibility of greatly improved traffic flow.

[Top]



Copyright 2002: IVsource.net and Richard Bishop Consulting (RBC).
All Rights Reserved.
Go to the IVsource Home Page
IVsource home

IVsource.net Home

October 2002