Go to the IVsource Home Page

IVsource.net Home

January 2003

The eSafety Working Group on Road Safety Issues Final Report, 28 Recommendations
IVsource.net
January 4, 2003

eSafety is an industry/public sector initiative for improving road safety by using new Information and Communications technologies.  The overall objective of the effort is to build up jointly a European strategy to accelerate the research, development, deployment and use of Intelligent Integrated Road Safety.



eSafety is an industry/public sector initiative for improving road safety by using new Information and Communications technologies.  The overall objective of the effort is to build up jointly a European strategy to accelerate the research, development, deployment and use of Intelligent Integrated Road Safety.  One example of the type of systems being considered is Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) for increasing road safety in Europe.

The eSafety activities are led by a High-Level Group (including top level persons in the automotive industry and government organizations) and an eSafety Working Group.  The Working Group met four times during 2002 and developed the set of recommendations described here, which were endorsed by the High Level Group in November.

Participants in the process (members of the Groups) include several directorates of the European Commission (which provides overall leadership) as well as:

  • User Organizations:  Automobile Club of Germany, International Federation of Automobile Clubs

  • Road Operators:  Cofiroute, Dutch Ministry of Transport, Association of West European Road Directors, Societa Autostrade

  • Vehicle Manufacturers:  DaimlerChrysler, Fiat, Ford, PSA, Renault, Volkswagen

  • Suppliers:  Navigation Technologies Europe, Siemens, TeleAtlas, Vodaphone

  • Enforcement: Dutch National Police Agency

  • Associations:  ERTICO

The entire process is driven by an ambitious goal adopted by the European Commission:  achieving a 50% reduction of road fatalities.  There is also some attention given to improving mobility through improvements in traffic flow.

Cooperative Systems Play a Key Role in Safety Strategy

The Final Report states that “we are now looking towards a new generation of active safety systems and Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems.  These systems will take into account not just the driver and the vehicle, but also the environment around the vehicle.  Co-operative systems will enable essential safety information to be exchanged between the vehicle and other vehicles, and the infrastructure.  By receiving information from outside of the vehicle, the systems will be able to assess the risk of an accident happening.  They can then warn the driver so that he can take appropriate action, or they can even initiate appropriate action.  If an accident becomes unavoidable the systems could use that same information to optimize the passive safety systems.  Other safety systems can also automatically summon assistance following an accident.”

The report emphasizes the importance of taking an integrated approach to road safety: “Integrated Intelligent Road Safety Systems will use information society technologies and intelligent transport systems in vehicles and the infrastructure for improving the safety of the vehicle, taking an integrated and global approach to safety, where the involvement of and interaction between the driver, the vehicle and the road environment are addressed together.  Integrated Safety Systems will help the driver in vehicle control and use new sensors for collision warning and mitigation, lane keeping, vulnerable road user detection, driver condition monitoring and improved vision.  Other technologies will provide for automatic emergency calls, adaptive speed limitation, traffic management and parking aids."

Vision for the Intelligent Vehicle

A very clear vision for vehicle-road systems of the future is offered by the eSafety Group in the report:

"The driver is sitting behind the steering wheel and is driving at 70 km/h.  He steers the vehicle into a corner.  To do so he uses information acquired by looking at the total road picture, the surroundings and his in-car instruments.  The in-car applications continuously receive information from cameras (visible light and infrared), in-vehicle radar systems, digital maps, GNSS satellites for location information, vehicle-infrastructure communication, information from other vehicles and the like.  The information collected by these sensors is verified by the in-vehicle control unit, integrated, analysed and processed, and presented to the driver.

"In this case, there has been an accident on the road, around the corner and not visible to the driver.  The Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), part of the on-board intelligent integrated safety system, intervenes by giving an audible warning (a spoken message), based on information received from vehicles ahead.  The driver knows that he remains in control of the vehicle and can always ignore signals or override active assistance.  He reduces speed, and is able to stop safely before the accident site.  His car starts immediately to broadcast warnings to the vehicles following behind.

"The driver is also aware that his car is equipped with a sophisticated safety system which can do even more in hazardous situations.  Depending on the degree and timing of the danger the system would inform him, warn him, actively assist him or ultimately actively intervene to avoid the danger.  If the intervention cannot avoid the crash completely, intelligent passive safety applications will be deployed in an optimal way to protect the vehicle occupants and possibly other parties involved in the accident (vulnerable road users).  The system will also automatically contact the emergency services indicating the severity and location of the accident. 

Recommendations:  Highlights

Several areas are seen in the report as representing significant steps forward.  The recommendations include a call for an Implementation Road Map that balances business, societal, and user issues.  The road map is envisioned as providing clear milestones for Intelligent Integrated Road Safety Systems, and is therefore seen as a key element for their successful take-up.  The report states that this Road Map “should indicate the technical and economic capability of the automotive industry to deploy intelligent integrated safety solutions, and, for the public sector, the time-table for infrastructure investments and other support measures.”

Development of digital maps capable of supporting safety systems is also emphasized.  The report asserts that the lack of a digital map containing safety-related road data of high quality is a major barrier for the introduction of autonomous and interactive safety systems. Recognizing that the private sector cannot undertake this alone, the recommendation states that “European road map data bases containing additional agreed attributes for driver-support and advisory purposes should be produced, maintained and certified under the responsibility of a public-private partnership and made available at acceptable prices for end users (possibly free of charge) and in an open format to all parties interested in implementing Intelligent Integrated Road Safety Systems and services.  This partnership should, among other tasks, define which data, attributes, functions and services will be required from both the mapping industry and the public sector road authorities, and determine how they will be compiled and certified. An important additional application will be the production of a specific database for commercial vehicles including data on weight, height and width restrictions on the road network.”

Incentives are called for to stimulate and support road users and fleet owners to buy vehicles with intelligent safety functions and to use safety-related services.  Incentives such as tax reductions, lowering insurance premiums, and preferential treatment are noted, and it is emphasized that this support should target especially the buyers who choose to equip their vehicles with co-operative safety systems, thus helping to create an initial market demand for advanced safety systems.  This initiative reflects similar discussions in the US regarding development of the “TEA-22” transportation legislation now being developed by the US Congress.

And, echoing themes heard at the eSafety conference in Lyon last September, the report calls for increased levels of international cooperation, in areas such as standardizations, development of test methodologies, legal issues, and benefits assessment.

Recommendations

Following is the full list of eSafety recommendations.

Accident Causation

(1) Consolidate analyses from the existing EU, Member State and industry road accident data which give information on the cause and circumstances of the accidents, for allowing the determination of the most efficient countermeasures, starting from the most frequent accident types.

(2) Define a common format and structure for recording accident data in the EU countries.  Develop jointly an European Accident Causation Database covering all EU and enlargement countries, and provide open access to industry and public agencies.
 

Assessing Impact of Safety Technologies

(3) Develop methodology to assess the potential impact of intelligent integrated safety technologies in Europe based on the accident causation data.  This work should carry out analysis of combined systems (fusion of sensors, integration and use of multiple active safety systems together).  

Develop validation methodology and procedures for vehicles equipped with Intelligent Integrated Road Safety Systems

(4) Set up a coordinated validation framework for operational tests for active safety systems in the Member States.  


Human-Machine Interaction

(5) Assess the reports by the Member States on the Commission Recommendation “Statement of Principles on safe and efficient in-vehicle information and communications systems”, and decide on further actions as necessary taking into account the rapid development in this area.

The use of portable (nomadic) devices requires urgent assessment of risks.

(6) Develop workload assessment, testing and certification methodology and procedures for complex in-vehicle working environments involving interfacing with in-vehicle devices for vehicle control, driver assistance, intelligent integrated safety, including Multi-Media systems.  


Intelligent Integrated Safety Systems Road Map

(7) a) Develop regularly reviewed Road Maps with technical steps and economic implications for the introduction of Intelligent Integrated Road Safety Systems.

a) These Road Maps should indicate the technical and economic capability of the stakeholder industries to deploy intelligent integrated safety solutions.

b) The public sector Road Maps should indicate the investments required for improvements in the road networks and information infrastructure based on the industrial Road Maps, and identify the steps needed for removing regulatory barriers.

Intelligent Integrated Road Safety Systems, Including ADAS

(8) Analyse existing accident causation data and possible countermeasures, and  determine clear goals and priorities for further RTD in Intelligent Integrated Road Safety Systems in industrial research, Community Research (Integrated Projects in the 6th FP) and national research programmes.

(9) Identify existing specifications, and where necessary develop new specifications for pan-European, standardised interoperable interfaces and communications protocols for vehicle-vehicle and vehicle-infrastructure communications which will support interactive, co-operative safety systems and services, including Traffic and Travel Information.

(10) Pursue international co-operation in the development of intelligent integrated safety technologies.

The co-operation should cover especially Human-Machine Interaction, certification and testing methodology and procedures, harmonisation and standardisation, legal issues, impact and socio-economic benefit analysis, and benchmarking/best practice.

Digital Maps for Safety

(11) Based on existing research results, define requirements for a European digital road map database.  This database should contain in addition to road map data agreed road safety attributes for driver-support for information and warning purposes, such as speed information and road configuration data.

Create a public-private partnership to produce, maintain certify and distribute this digital road map data base.  It should be made available for all users at affordable prices (possibly free of charge).  National, local and regional authorities and operators should provide safety-related data on road configurations within their networks, with target dates for implementation.  

Emergency Services

(12) After consultations (telecommunications authorities, civil protection authorities, industry through CGALIES) adopt a Commission Recommendation on the introduction and implementation of E-112 in Europe.

(13) Establish a European Emergency Communications Forum to continue the CGALIES work and to monitor the implementation of E-112 in the Member States.

Establish national liaison groups to co-ordinate the implementation and building up of the E-112 service chain.

(14) For in-vehicle emergency calls (e-calls), establish data requirements and data transfer protocol for e-Calls originating from vehicles. Establish an interface specification and routing and handling procedures for e-Calls with location and other accident-related information.  


Traffic and Travel Information

(15) Analyse the Member States’ responses to the TTI Recommendation, draw up further actions if necessary, and make a progress report to the Council and the European Parliament.

(16) Create public-private partnerships to capture, process and provide real-time traffic, travel and road condition data from a variety of sources, including Floating Vehicle Data.

(17) Support the wider use of the pan-European RDS/TMC network for safety-related traffic information.

Provide a report with required actions to the European Commission on the status of RDS/TMC implementation and the remaining bottlenecks.


Motor Vehicle Type-Approval Legislation

(18) Determine what actions may be required for rapidly bringing forward road safety improvements obtainable with Intelligent Integrated Road Safety Systems in vehicles.  


Standardization

(19) Analyse the specific needs and priorities of the intelligent integrated road safety systems for standardisation in ISO, CEN and ETSI.

For vehicle-vehicle and vehicle-infrastructure communications, promote the accelerated standardisation of emerging communications protocols.  For CEN, based on the recently published report of the M270 mandate, choose the appropriate mechanisms (Committee Working Agreements, full EN standards), and establish the necessary working groups.


Legal Issues in Market Introduction

(20) Develop a methodology for risk benefit assessment, achieve an industrial and societal consensus on a European Code of Practice, and establish guidelines for facilitating the market introduction of Intelligent Integrated Road Safety Systems.  


Ultra Wide Band Short Range Radar

(21) Take the necessary actions for removing regulatory barriers to the use of the 24 GHz spectrum for short-range radar in Europe.  This will include issuing an EU liaison statement to ECC and to national administrations requesting international regulations through the ITU-R concerning UWB Radar Sensors.

(22) Undertake the standardisation in ETSI for the 24GHz UWB Radar by implementing the EU Mandate for ETSI and completing and publishing the relevant standard.  

Societal Aspects

(23) Estimate the socio-economic benefits which can be obtained through the reduction of fatalities, injuries and material damage by the introduction of Intelligent Integrated Road Safety Systems.  This should include an analysis of the reduction in medical care and other expenses in the Member States and enlargement states, and benefits like improved journey times and reduced congestion and environmental impact.

(24) Stimulate and support road users and fleet owners to buy vehicles with intelligent safety functions and to use safety-related services by incentives such as tax reductions, lowering insurance premiums, and preferential treatment.

This support should target especially the buyers who choose to equip their vehicles with co-operative safety systems, thus helping to create an initial market demand for advanced safety systems.


Business Case

(25) Identify best practices for positive business cases to promote the introduction of Intelligent Integrated Road Safety Systems, including analysis of the required bundling of the functions, priorities for market introduction, co-funding schemes, and public private partnership.

(26) Support the e-Call business model by implementing the full service chain and ensuring inter-operability, compatibility with E-112 systems and direct links to infrastructure operators and vehicle breakdown services. Training of personnel has to be provided for.

User Outreach

(27) Design and execute awareness campaigns which explain the benefits, functioning and use of the Intelligent Integrated Road Safety Systems to the consumers.


ESafety Forum

(28) Create an eSafety Forum with the objective to monitor and promote the implementation of these recommendations, and to support the development, deployment and use of intelligent integrated road safety systems.  Determine its objectives, Terms of Reference, draft a Memorandum of Understanding and organisation.  Establish membership and work programme.   

 

[Top]


For More Information ...

... www.eu.int/information_society/programmes/esafety/index_en.htm

[Top]



Copyright 2003: IVsource.net and Richard Bishop Consulting (RBC).
All Rights Reserved.
Go to the IVsource Home Page
IVsource home

IVsource.net Home

January 2003